Thursday, May 18, 2023

A glass blown Roman Mouse

 

What ?

Roman mouse

The extant example

My version


Overall H: 4.7 cm, L: 12.7 cm

Also found in blue glass

Glassblowing developed in the Syro-Palestinian region in the early first century B.C. and is thought to have come to Rome with craftsmen and slaves after the area’s annexation to the Roman world in 64 B.C. The new technology revolutionized the Italian glass industry, these advantages spurred a rapid evolution of style and form, and experimentation with the new technique led craftsmen to create novel and unique shapes; examples exist of flasks and bottles shaped like foot sandals, wine barrels, fruits, and even helmets and animals[i]

The top one has accurate measurements


 

Where ?

Rome

When ?

200-399 BCE

 

 

 

Why ?

 

LOOK HOW CUTE AND RANDOM IT IS.

Also, I changed the mouse to give it some slightly more rat like features so that it would fit the category of “rat”.

Unguentaria (tear bottles), and other small vessels held various oils, perfumes, and cosmetics used by nearly every member of Roman society.[ii]

It holds a surprising amount of liquid.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Evidence

 

https://www.cmog.org/artwork/mouse

PRIMARY DESCRIPTION: Very pale brownish yellow, transparent glass, with pale blue streaks; blown, applied. Animal with object in its mouth. Animal has spheroid head, constriction at neck, slender pear-shaped body, and slightly upturned tubular tail with open end, all blown from one pale yellow gather. Tip of tail has plain rim with rounded lip. Yellow glass has many small bubbles, some of which are elongated. Eyes, ears, nose, mouth and object carried in it, and legs represented by blue blobs tooled to appropriate shapes: eyes are small circular disks; ears are flat semicircles: mouth is single blob tooled to form jaws, with excess glass pulled up to make nose and with two flattened blobs of glass, one on top of other, in open mouth; all four limbs are blobs that have been pinched and in three cases bent at ends to represent feet.

Another similar artwork: https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/257875  

 

 

 

 

Extra Details

 

In the original the glass on the “mouse’s” face is damaged. The museum says that is carrying something, but it looks like glass that may have been squished when it was cooling down. I chose to just make the nose more elongated to look like a rat’s nose.

The technique uses glassblowing, which I am new to. This involves blowing into a metal straw that has been coated in bead release. This must be done very precisely otherwise you make exploding glass bubbles. Which is fun. But probably high on the danger scale. I made this a couple of times and learnt very quickly how to manage my time and glass without having everything just shatter. The only thing I would change on this version is the thickness of the tail, but the thinner I go, the more chance of breaking. I will continue to practice this. I was happy with the matching of glass colour, and the shape in general, even though it took a while to get right.

 

Reproduction of a Merovingian Necklace

What? 23 monochrome, biconical glass beads from the Merovingian period

Where? Sigmaringen

When? 7th Century

Why? I chose this strand of beads as I loved how colourful and unique, they are. They are all undecorated, and whilst they may look simple, the biconical shape is complex to achieve well, and I have struggled with this in the past. Some of these beads are very worn, and as you can see the colour appears quite dull, unlike the new glass, which being modern, also has less impurities. This fits the Low Countries because Sigmaringen was part of Merovingian dynasty which stretch out across the Benelux countries/ Low Countries.

Details of the Recreation: I chose to recreate the strand displayed. Initially, I did not have the confirmed size of the individual bead. I emailed the British Museum who put me in contact with the curator. She kindly let me know that the beads average 1cm. I worked closely with a printed image of the work that I had printed to scale. I used a cm mapped out on my paper to check sizing and mimicked the more specific shapes such as the dark blue beads being smaller and less biconical. There weren’t many details of the excavation, so I used organic material to string the beads together. Organic materials such as linen thread was commonly used throughout times and cultures. The lay out of the beads is the same as the museum, but this may be a modern aesthetic.

 

The original

My version


Materials and techniques:

·         Glass

·         Technique: lampwork techniques to recreate a similar shape and size in each bead.

·         String: Corded string

     

     Images of the process: 







Working with Glass:

I have been working on developing my skill at melting glass and shaping it over the last couple of years. I have learnt a lot, including where in the flame certain glass must be placed so that it doesn’t ruin the colour or texture. I have learnt how to steadily place my hands and rotate both glass and mandrel so that an even amount of glass, at the right temperature, is kept at the right heat to reproduce the desired bead.

The necklace presented a variety of challenges. Glass is a dangerous, sometimes fickle substance, and certain colours only work properly at a certain heat.

Some of the trickier techniques (and melting glass onto a mandrel and keeping it even is tricky to start with!) that I used for this project include:

·         Studying each (photo of) bead in a variety of lights to get an accurate grasp of the details.

·         Technique of shaping initial bead, then shaping one side, keeping sides even, and then shaping the other side, whilst keeping everything even and melting at the correct temperature.

·         Working with tricky colours. These were all tricky. Light blue flashes (changes colour), red flashes, white burns, green can go red or brown, yellow gets red markings and the dark blue was a special shade and prone to melting too hot and reforming with impurities.

·         Shaping similar size beads


Details of the equipment and resources:

 

·         I used a graphite paddle, mandrels, bead release, a knife, fire annealing and gravity. I try to use the least tools possible and authentic equipment that would have been used by the glassmakers of the time. Apart from my fire set-up, all the equipment I have used would have been used at the time as well.

·         Clear broken glass was often used as well as imported blocks of coloured glass. (Regia Anglorum)

·         The glass rods I used to recreate these beads were Effetre Murano – 104 COE soft glass rods. This is a close replica of the glass that would have been used at the time.

·         Bead artisans would have created a small kiln or furnace. The broken recycled glass would be put into the furnace through holes in the side to melt in a dish inside the furnace. Air was pumped into the furnace to keep the charcoal hot. (Guido)

·         I use a hot head torch and MAPP gas. In the future I have plans to recreate a small portable kiln but melting glass in a small kiln is very difficult as getting the heat hot enough to melt the glass is a struggle.

·         Metal rods (mandrels) were dipped with a clay mixture called bead release. The molten glass is wound onto the rod until the desired shape was achieved. Once the bead size and shape were achieved, a design could be added by heating thin bits of glass and wrapping them around the bead, with a “stringer” that was heated and laid on top. (Guido)

·         I use mandrels that would have been very similar to those used, however, mine are shorter as they don’t need to be as long to reach into a hot fire. The bead release I use has the crucial ingredients of water, kaolin and alumina hydrate, which is a composition that would have been used.

·         Beads would then be moved to an annealing dish in the furnace. This would prevent thermal shock, lowering the chances of the bead cracking.

·         Instead of annealing them in a furnace, I use a product called vermiculite to allow the beads to cool down slowly. I also use a kiln. In the future, I would like to try annealing them in a furnace to see what it is like.

·         After the beads are finished, I remove them from the mandrels, clean them out with some bead cleaning tools and give them a quick clean with some soapy water.


Future Projects:

 

·         In the future, I would like to continue to practice more difficult skills, e.g., fine line work, millefiori use and making the Chinese Warring state Beads which had over 100 steps each.

·         I am enjoying creating pieces from different times and cultures that people have never seen, and I will continue to develop my skills by continuing to choose challenging and unique projects.

·         I also enjoyed working with the museum and the professor when I recreated a 133 bead Phoenician necklace, and I would like to continue working with people like this. Not only was it very educational and rewarding, but it resulted in me contributing to the historical accuracy of the museum- which I thought was cool! This project led the British museum to writing more specific information too, which is awesome!

·         I also intend to work on another historical recreation of a glass making set up.

Primary resource:

https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/object/H_1908-0801-538

Provenance:
Sigmaringen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany; grave 5, found 1900; associated with 1908,0801.539

 

Secondary Resources: 

Guido, Margaret. The Glass Beads of Anglo-Saxon England: c. AD 400-700, Boydell Press, 1999.

Holgate, Barbara.  “The Pagan Lady of Peel”, St. Patrick’s Isle Archaeological Trust, 1987. 

Regia Anglorum: https://regia.org/

McGloin, Jemma: Of Beads and Burials: A Microwear and Experimental Study of Early Medieval Glass and Amber Beads from the Merovingian Site of Lent-Lentseveld.